DeKalb School Budget 2012 – 2013 Passed

I am sure that everyone is aware of the budget passed by the Board of Education on June 21, 2012. There is no doubt that this budget was going to bring pain to many because of the size of its impact. Reducing $85 million from your budget is going to have impact on services rendered. It could have been better. A few of us asked for deeper probes. It appears that stones were left unturned because staff thought it to be unwise.

Knowing that many of our budgets had been wasting money for years, probably a decade or longer, made me really want to get it right. We needed to eliminate the extras that we cannot afford or anything that deviates money from going to children in the classroom. I believe we still have more work to do in cutting the central office. The Superintendent has made great impact here, but more work should be done.

We missed cutting in some obvious places that could make some difference. DOLA, middle school athletics, magnet transportation, and further central office cuts. The magnet transportation is left over from the days of the court order regarding segregation of DeKalb Schools. We have been removed from that order for several years now. $1.8 million that could go to the classroom. This is 30 teachers, 51 parapros, or all of the media specialists that were eliminated. I had been talking to the superintendent about offering the transportation for the magnets for a fee. I believe that would have offered a reasonable alternative and provide some convenience for our magnet students and parents.

I am also disturbed about the millage increase. Why do you give money to an entity that has misused it for so many years? That enables the “addict” to continue their behavior without modification. Had I felt that our budget was as tight as it could get, I could have supported a millage increase because then it really would be for the “kids”. Next year will be difficult at best. The most we can raise with a millage increase next year is $14.8 million. Of course the value of a mill will certainly decline leaving us even more revenue needy.

One interesting observation. Had we adopted the Superintendent’s alternate option without the tax increase we still would have covered the $85 million deficit and had a small reserve in the General Fund. Things that make you go HMMMMM……..

Where do we go from here? Many folks have asked me about fraud or some illegal aspect in our budget department and in human resources. I do not have the answers to that, but we should know something in the future. KPMG is conducting a forensic audit for us now. It should point out if the questions we all have are real or mythical. Their findings should point directly to where, if any, improprieties occurred. I am just like everyone else. I want to know WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, and WHY. It is at that time that we can ask investigations to take place with solid evidence behind us.

On a brighter note I attended our summer leadership conference this past week. Our leadership was there working hard with our principals and assistant principals. The work on our curriculum looks impressive. Dr. Howe has really tried to put things into our teachers hands that they can use from day one.
We have written a new and more rigorous curriculum aligned to common core standards. Teachers will go into classrooms next year with unit plans and model lesson plans. There will be an increased emphasis on reading.

Thank you everyone for your support. We need everyone to make this school system a formidable strength in our county. Please call or email.

Thanks,
Don

Budget: Pre-K, Fernbank, Magnets

I would like to give everyone an update on the latest budget news. Late in the afternoon on June 11 the BOE found out from the county tax assessor that our property tax revenues would be down an additional 3%. That equates to an additional $12 million. That means the BOE shortfall is no longer $73 million, but $85 million. This news is really devastating. It leaves the BOE with few options to a balanced budget. Our problem is that the BOE cannot raise revenues it can only cut “overhead”. The news is not good and will take further belt tightening by all of us.

Some information on pertinent items that are pressing to many of you.

1. Pre-K Right now it seems that the proposal will be to keep Pre-K but fund it at the state level only. My feeling is that Pre-K will probably not be eliminated. I am supporting keeping the program but funding it at the state funded levels.

2. Fernbank. I had hopes that we could retain a more robust program at Fernbank. The additional $12 million shortfall made that option less likely. It appears that Fernbank will remain open, but its budget will be reduced substantially. The positive side of this is that the science center will remain to potentially rise again as our budget nightmare gradually subsides over time.

3. Magnet-Theme school transportation. I favor saving the the $1.8 million spent here. Providing this transportation to “choice” schools is a luxury we can no longer afford. The legal aspect of this is that we must provide transportation to neighborhood schools, but choice schools are outside of this requirement. This is money that can go into the classroom and to teachers and not in the fuel tank.

4. I would also like to get your opinions on whether we should save some of our $85,000 payment to SACS for school accreditation. If we cut back to just paying for the high school’s we will save what is equal to one teacher’s job.

Thank you everyone for hanging in there with us. Please send any ideas on the budget you think might make an impact. Even one idea out of hundreds could turn into a plus for our students and teachers.

On Wednesday June 12 the BOE will all be headed to Savannah, Ga. for the Georgia School Board Association’s state convention. This is part of our state mandated training. I have always found much of the training to be advantageous to me.

The BOE wil be meeting again on June 20 to further attack the budget and the options available to us.

Budget News

I want to thank everyone for sharing their ideas and perspectives on the budget. I find great value in hearing your views.

The recent Public Budget hearings also included some interesting comments.

My perspective on how to approach our $73 million deficit is similar to many comments that you have shared with me. These ideas are mine and are not necessarily endorsed by everyone on the BOE.

My general view is that we cannot continue to fund “boutique programs” at a different rate than our regular schools and other programs. Can we afford to spend $5000 per student at school A while spending $25,000 a student at school B? Every child deserves the best quality product we can provide.  We should make sure our funding reflects this philosphy.

I oppose raising the millage rate. Until we have made every possible cut internally, we should not turn to the taxpayer for relief. The DeKalb taxpayer has suffered with county government tax increases and additional fees with their water bills. We have the highest millage rate in the metro area and have been at this rate for 9 years.  It is not prudent to increase this rate given the current economic conditions.  We must also restore the public trust in our school district.

At the public hearing it was clear that there is some confusions regarding certain budget items.  Several citizens noted that the BOE budget had increased and was in excess of $3 million. This is not the case.  Unfortunately, the district’s legal fees are lumped into the Board line item.  We have asked the Superintendent to break those out for clarity.  A BOE member makes approximately $21,000. Two years ago when the teachers were asked to take a salary cut of 3% many of us on the BOE took a voluntary 10% cut. I have continued my deduction since that time.

The budget process is difficult because a number of costs beyond our control have increased.  The state has passed on large increases in the cost of benefits (health and retirement) for our employees that we are obligated to pay.  In addition the amount of state funding that the district has received has decreased substantially of several years.  These factors, along with a declination in property values have contributed to our dire budget situation.  No one likes to cut education budgets but I am mindful that we must “right size” our district, critically view all programs, and place all the options on the table.

Many community members have reached out to me with questions about the Fernbank Science Center (FSC).  The warranty deed for the FSC stipulates that the property must be used as a science or cultural center or it will revert back to the previous owner.  This property is valuable to the district and the current board consensus is to maintain the FSC but with a smaller budget. I have also met with a group of people who are trying to secure private funding for the science center. They seem very devoted and reasonable in their approach to try to help the school district.  I look forward to developing new public/private partnerships that will benefit the students and taxpayers of DeKalb.

Many of you are concerned that  we might be eliminating various programs (Montessori, Magnets, etc.). The proposal is not to eliminate them but to fund them at the same level as all other schools.

These are just a few points to ponder. Please continue to send me your ideas and questions. I look forward to hearing from you!